Australian Egalitarian Movement :: Offering a Socialist Political Alternative

Australian Egalitarian Movement


Home > Major Policies > Common Questions About, and Criticisms of Egalitarianism > Lazy Workers   


Home Page

Our Mission

About the AEM

Our Major Policies
and Explanations

Questions & Answers

Current Affairs

Join the AEM
FREE Membership

Contact Us





Lazy Workers Will Be Paid Just as Much as Everybody Else

Before we set about the task of explaining why the public does not need to worry about whether or not lazy workers are going to receive the same pay as everyone else, there is something very important that needs to be said. If you added all the money that all the lazy workers of one generation cost the society for all of their lives, collectively, they would probably not be ripping off the society more than one Kerry Packer in one year. The point that we are making is that the amount of money lost to the society by lazy workers is minute compared to the amount of money lost to the society by those people at the big end of the economy. And it would indeed be a tragedy if the public allows the elite to continue to siphon off the majority of the nation's wealth just to stop lazy workers getting away with receiving as much pay as everyone else. And this is particularly so when one's pay and one private and public lives are not going to change regardless of whether or not lazy workers get away with it. After saying this however, there is no doubt that the public will continue to be encouraged by our capitalist constitution, our political and business leaders, and the media to think this self-righteous and vindictive way towards lazy workers rather than towards people who hold power and/or wealth within our capitalist society. That is, they encourage us to look down so that we don't think about looking up (at them), and unfortunately, this strategy has been extremely successful within all democratic-capitalist societies. And in doing so, these powerful people demonstrate just how ruthlessly manipulative they are prepared to be when it comes to maintaining their positions of power. In fact, one would have to be very self-righteous and vindictive indeed to allow themselves to continue to be economically and socially dominated, and to accept endemic corruption and many other serious and completely unnecessary social and environmental problems, just so a small group of people who one regards as being beneath one's self, don't get away with being regarded by the state as equal to one. To say this another way, one would be prepared to throw away $50B annually so that lazy workers don't get away with wasting $1B annually.  

To answer the title critique, in the AEM's Egalitarian society, we certainly do have a number of ways to motivate all workers to do their best in the workplace. Firstly, while it is difficult to receive more pay than other full-time workers, it is not difficult or invalid to receive less pay. For example, one may work less hours and therefore live at a lower standard of living. In fact, many people will voluntarily choose this option for a variety of reasons. Similarly, some people may choose to do less work in the same amount of time, and be paid by how much work they do. However, there is nothing stopping an Egalitarian government from enforcing lower pays on workers who don't perform as well as is expected of them. For example, if one repeatedly produces 5 hours worth of work in a 8-hour period: unless there is some valid reason for this, the state may decide (after giving a warning) to only pay one for 5 hours worth of work. This motivates such workers to either work harder or to change jobs to something that they can be more competitive within (This policy doesn't generally apply to workers with disabilities). 

Secondly, everybody's performance in the workplace, including people's success or failure in the working challenges they choose to take on, as well as any extra work or study people undertake in their spare time are evaluated in several ways, and these evaluations are used to determine.... 

  • who advances and who doesn't; 
  • who wins a vacant job or scholarship and who doesn't; 
  • who is more able to direct their career and who isn't; and 
  • who will gain more workplace autonomy and who won't. 

Therefore, people who are lazy will....

  • find it more difficult to advance or to remain competitive enough to keep certain jobs; 
  • find it more difficult to gain other jobs or scholarships; 
  • have less ability to direct their own careers; and 
  • find it more difficult to escape highly supervised working conditions (although this does not mean that most of the workers in supervised occupations are considered lazy). 

Of course, we do have a bit of latitude in such matters as everyone can make the wrong decision when choosing jobs, especially while they're young. 

After saying this however, laziness is often associated with working or being trapped in a job that one is not motivated by. There is no doubt that the Egalitarian government has some responsibility, duty of care, and even different expectations when selecting people with different aptitudes for various jobs. Also, to a large extent, state organised career guidance is available to everyone, and therefore it may often be just as much the fault of this state guidance that leads to people undertaking jobs that they are not suited for. As such, the state needs to acknowledge that the state and the particular workplace have some bearing on whether or not workers are motivated to perform to the best of their abilities, rather than to do what occurs now in our capitalist society. That is, to lay all the blame on the individual worker, as part of the process of denying that there is anything wrong with the capitalist system or that particular boss or that particular place of employment. 

Also, it should be recognised that capitalism tends to create unmotivated and lazy workers. We all find it easy to understand how higher wages motivate people to do their best and to even work longer hours, but we tend to deny that low pays and the knowledge that one's working life is not going to improve, serve to de-motivate people from giving their all. Also, laziness may often be associated with depression, and depression is not necessarily an irrational response to the circumstances of people's lives, including their working lives. Generally however, unlike the capitalist system, workers within the AEM's Egalitarian society will know that while they may often be involved in work they don't like, they won't be stuck in these jobs forever, or even all day, and that they are receiving the same pay as everybody else, and these circumstances go along way to reducing the de-motivation, laziness, and depression that capitalism serves to induce in many people.   

What we are saying is that to a large extent, laziness is a social problem. That is, the circumstance of society, and one circumstances within that society induce laziness in individuals. As such, the state does have a fair amount of responsibility in finding ways to motivate people to want to do their best for their country, and to keep them motivated. We believe that this is best achieved when the people believe in their society, but it is currently very difficult for many people within the capitalist society to believe in their society when they....

  • see the enormous gap between the rich and the poor; 
  • know that they are always going to be the working poor;
  • know that life is only going to get harder as prices and taxes rise; 
  • know that their children are going to be disadvantaged because of their inability to escape lower wages; 
  • know that they are being socially disadvantaged; and
  • know that the funding provided to social services is always going to be inadequate. 

Some people may suggest that lazy people will end up doing the easiest jobs simply because they can't be trusted to hold more responsible positions. However, these jobs are generally out competed for by older workers (who have paid their dues more because they have had more time to do more work), and by the injured. 

One last point, it is within the capitalist society that workers often get away with being lazy because when they change jobs (and employers), it is often easy to hide one's past slack efforts when one has always been employed, and particularly when one has a stable work history. One may also falsify the information on one's resume. In the job interview, it is easy to sound enthusiastic, and sometimes, past employers will often provide a slack worker with a good reference just so other employers, who are following up on these references, stop annoying them. But in the AEM's Egalitarian society, we always know everything about your working life and efforts because everybody works for the state, and as such it is impossible to out compete others for a job by concealing one's past laziness.  

It is also interesting to see what people regard as laziness. We have been conditioned to automatically look at the little people when considering what laziness is, but laziness is at work in all levels of the workforce and society. Also, we believe that elitism is motivated by laziness in that one is now able to have someone else do one's work for one, including simple personal chores such as cooking and ironing. After all, this is why many people want to be rich. Owning a business and letting someone else manage it is motivated by laziness. Marrying a rich partner, or someone who is prepared to support one, and using this circumstance to quit working is motivated by laziness. Remaining a housewife or househusband after the children no longer need full-time care is motivated by laziness. Becoming a superviser or boss is in part, usually sought as a means of escaping physical labour and this could also be regarded as being motivated by laziness. And the higher one gets in the chain of command often means doing less work by delegating it to others, and many people truly do abuse these positions through being motivated by laziness. Having a hit single or writing a best seller, and then living off the royalties is motivated by laziness. To retire early is motivated by laziness. Making money by investing money is motivated by laziness. Suing someone for millions is often motivated by laziness. Gambling, including gambling on the stock market is motivated by laziness. Overcharging and conning people are motivated by laziness. Claiming a higher wage is motivated by laziness. Buying and selling at a profit is motivated by laziness. The moral of this story is that within our capitalist society, lazy people are ruling and economically abusing the society, and here you are worrying about whether or not lazy people are going to receive just as much pay as everybody else within an Egalitarian society.


Home | Our Mission | About the AEM | Major Policies | Current Issues | Join the AEM | Contact Us | Feedback | Resource

Legal Issue:  Copyright  |  Privacy  |  Disclaimer